Thread: Caller ID
View Single Post
  #38 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
jmcquown[_2_] jmcquown[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36,804
Default Caller ID

On 1/17/2015 1:34 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 13:26:34 -0500, James Silverton wrote:
>
>> All the phones that are convenient in my house can display Caller ID. I
>> have taken only to answering those that show an intelligible identity
>> and not "unknown caller" etc., nor "wireless caller" nor a phone number.
>>
>> I also have an answering service and I wonder if I am making any
>> unfortunate mistakes with my policy since any serious caller will leave
>> a message including ID?

>
> If you're THIS lonely to be posting all this OT crap here, then you
> should be answering ALL the calls that you get.
>
> of course you know you'll get dozens of replies about spam
> telemarketing here, just like you did last time you instigated a
> similar conversation.
>
> Nothing but a lonely troll.
>
> -sw
>

We *do* seem to go through this pointless discussion once a year at the
very least.

If they won't identify themselves or leave a message then it can't be
terribly important. Seems pretty simple to me. Then again, I have no
problem ignoring a ringing telephone.

Jill