On Sat, 06 Dec 2014 00:06:03 -0800, sf > wrote:
>On Sat, 06 Dec 2014 08:17:16 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 5 Dec 2014 13:01:03 -0800, "Pico Rico" >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"Janet" > wrote in message
>> et...
>> >> In article >,
>> >> says...
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>> Husband passed his stone. The pain he had seemed much like going
>> >>> through childbirth.
>> >>
>> >> I've done both, and IMHO, passing a kidney stone is far more painful
>> >> than childbirth. And takes longer :-(
>> >>
>> >> Janet UK
>> >
>> >and the result is far less impressive!
>>
>> I dunno about that.
>
>A microscopic "stone" vs a human baby?
Hmm... normal folk pee through their uretha, but sf pees through her
vagina... her knowlege of human anatomy is absolutely thrilling!
Kidney stones that are large enough to cause discomfort are not
microscopic, people pass microscopic kidney stones constantly and feel
nothing. Of course one needs to consider the size of the stone
relative to the diameter of the tube through which it passes... sf's
birth canal can pass the rock of gibralter. LOL-LOL
http://kidney.niddk.nih.gov/kudiseases/pubs/stones_ez/
http://www.webmd.com/kidney-stones/s...tones-overview