"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> "sf" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 08:36:12 -0700 (PDT), Bryan-TGWWW
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On Saturday, October 18, 2014 7:59:55 PM UTC-5, jmcquown wrote:
>>> > On 10/18/2014 3:47 PM, ImStillMags wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > On Saturday, October 18, 2014 11:39:26 AM UTC-7, sf wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >> On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 11:19:45 -0700 (PDT), ImStillMags
>>> >
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>> > >> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>> > >>> by using canned beans instead of dry beans
>>> >
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>> > >> Huh. I'm not finding support for that. SFgate says: Sugar, high
>>> >
>>> > >> fructose corn syrup and other sweeteners produce a sweeter beans
>>> > >> that
>>> >
>>> > >> are significantly higher in calories. A 3.5-ounce serving of plain
>>> >
>>> > >> boiled adzuki beans, for example, has 128 calories and less than 25
>>> >
>>> > >> grams of carbohydrates, while an equivalent amount of sweetened
>>> > >> canned
>>> >
>>> > >> adzuki beans supplies 237 calories and 55 grams of carbohydrates.
>>> >
>>> > >> http://healthyeating.sfgate.com/drie...lues-3026.html
>>> >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > > going by the nutrition label on the can of beans, the whole can of
>>> > > beans is 53 net carbs.
>>> >
>>> > > there is no sugar listed on the ingredients.
>>> >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > > when you add up ALL the carbs in the TOTAL of a 6.5 quart pot of
>>> > > chili, trust me I did the math, it came out to 9 carbs per cup
>>> >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > Why would she bellyache over your carb counts? Honest to gawd. You
>>> >
>>> > made a pot of chili. (I still have no idea where I could find friggin
>>> >
>>> > adzuki beans, canned or otherwise.)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > The carb police don't need to swoop in to question your dinner.
>>> > What's
>>> >
>>> > next, you didn't make gluten free cornbread? OMG.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > What happened to the days when people just cooked, ate, enjoyed and
>>> >
>>> > posted about it? NO quantifying, qualifying and turning everything
>>> > into
>>> >
>>> > the latest diet ledger?
>>> >
>>> Some of us would like to get laid, and not being a fat-**** helps in
>>> that
>>> department. You're content to be a sexless old maid. Not everyone
>>> feels
>>> that way.
>>> >
>>
>> I've been on rfc since the '90s and it has never been the way Jill
>> seems to remember. Sheldon talked about weenies (alluding to penis's)
>> back then - but it's basically the same ole same ole.
>>
>> In any case, I asked an honest question. Sitara said she was lowering
>> the carb count and I asked how she was doing it. She said she was
>> using canned beans, which is something people don't usually use when
>> they are trying to lower their carb count but I didn't know why - so I
>> looked it up. The nutritional value of canned vs dry beans was the
>> point of that article and the name of the bean was purely
>> incidental... + "for example" is clearly stated, so I have no idea
>> what Jill's problem was. Nor do I care.
>
> To be fair, I couldn't understand why canned beans would be lower carb
> than dried ... when cooked of course.

They're not and I am confused. I thought this was someone else who posted
this. Not Sitara?