On 10/3/2014 4:04 AM, Jeßus wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Oct 2014 21:29:14 -0500, Sky >
> wrote:
>
>> On 10/2/2014 9:04 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>
>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> On 10/2/2014 6:58 PM, sf wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 2 Oct 2014 15:23:28 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, I don't often see anyone mentioning children who are currently at
>>>>>> home.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tara has kids at home, I think Tert does too. There are probably
>>>>> others.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> At home, not at home. What does it matter? The fact is most people
>>>> don't drag their children into every single post.
>>>
>>> And neither do I!
>> ! ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ! <<---------------------
>>
>> What a bunch of crock!! This is just another fine example how the
>> bovine lies and exaggerates.
>>
>> "It" uses _nearly every thread_ to mention its pitiable spouse and their
>> even more pitiable issue. There are just too many samples to cite in
>> RFC and other poor newsgroups subjected to its idiotic presence and
>> fabricated scenarios!
>
> Only a few hours later and we have the 'I'm making a hope chest!'
> post, which is all about... guess what?
>

Yeah - sad thing is, its issue is hopeless to get anything worthwhile
from its maternal parent! So sad . . . poor thing!

Sky