On 8/8/2014 1:42 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Aug 2014 14:30:36 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
>
>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Thu, 7 Aug 2014 02:05:16 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>
>>>> "sf" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> On Thu, 07 Aug 2014 05:58:25 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe that cat-abducting racoon is back, only this time ****ing on her
>>>>>> bread?
>>>>>
>>>>> Your turn to go lie down. He had moldy bread and it wasn't old.
>>>>
>>>> And in his stupidity, he took a pic which clearly showed the date. So we
>>>> know it wasn't old. And mine wasn't either. Same situation but when I
>>>> post
>>>> of it, I'm some sort of freak.
>>>
>>> And as I explained, the date was wrong and didn't match all the other
>>> identical packages of bread - it was 4-5 days ahead of all the other
>>> packages. Regardless, it was *one* package of bread.
>>>
>>> How often have I complained about moldy bread, Julie? Damned, you're
>>> one stupid broad. That black cloud above your house is there for YOU,
>>> Julie!
>>
>> And I complained twice. So?
>
> Nah, no, no no. You made 132 followups all bitching and making
> excuses about your moldy bread and why it shouldn't be so.
>
> I made *nine* direct followups about my bread and unlike you I
> actually stated a CONCLUSION! Something you would never dare.
>
> Nine... vs... 132. ... one hundred and thirty two...vs...9 <sigh>
>
> -sw
>
Yer addicted to her, woman-hater.