On Mon, 07 Jul 2014 08:00:02 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote:

>On 7/6/2014 9:41 PM, Jeßus wrote:
>> On Sun, 06 Jul 2014 17:58:29 -0700, sf > wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 07 Jul 2014 09:13:16 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>>>
>>>> As with most any other country. Not sure why the Philippines shouldn't
>>>> have kangaroo <shrug>.
>>>
>>> Get over yourself. My point is, unlike your situation, it's not on
>>> the common person's dinner table. Maybe they serve it to rich Asian
>>> tourists, but I've never heard any Filipino talk about eating kangaroo
>>> in the PI.
>>
>> No. That's wasn't your point at all. You said you thought Travis had
>> been duped, which implies you think something other than kangaroo had
>> been served up to him.
>>
>> Again you try to move the goal posts, it's quite a habit of yours.
>>
>Except Travis responded to sf:
>
>They did "themes" from time to time, and the kangaroo was available
>during "Australian Month". They actually had a large inflated kangaroo
>at the entrance to the restaurant for the month. Kangaroo was not
>normally on the menu, so I expect that it was authentic, brought in just
>for that month's theme.
>
>Now, I understand you're saying why couldn't they have it in the
>Phillipines? But apparently, at least at this one hotel where Travis
>stayed, it was not a regular thing.

Agree about that. I was referring to sf's earlier comment, not what
Travis said.