On Sat, 5 Jul 2014 16:25:40 +0100, Janet > wrote:
> In article >,
> says...
> >
> > On Fri, 04 Jul 2014 21:41:38 -0400, S Viemeister
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > On 7/4/2014 8:56 PM, sf wrote:
> > > > > wrote:
> > > >> On 7/4/2014 5:03 PM, Ophelia wrote:
> > > >>> "sf" > wrote in message
> > > >>>> Just curious... how many quarts is yours?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Four! (I didn't know so I just had to go and measure it) 
)
> > > >>>
> > > >> Four US quarts, or four Imperial quarts?
> > > >
> > > > You know the answer to that.
> > > >
> > > If I did, I wouldn't have asked.
> >
> > The difference isn't enough to matter unless you're doing a scientific
> > experiment.
>
> Of course it is; the difference is more than one and a half (US)
> pints.
>
I'm not using hers to cook, she's not using mine and we are talking
the fact that hers has a TIMER built in and mine doesn't. It's a
simple observation - the comparative sizes of Imperial vs US quarts
doesn't matter in this context. You're sounding like adolescent boys
nattering about mine is bigger than yours.
--
I take life with a grain of salt, a slice of lemon and a shot of tequila