"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 14:36:52 -0400, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>
>> On 2014-04-24 1:46 PM, sf wrote:
>> > On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 11:57:59 -0400, Dave Smith
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 2014-04-24 10:46 AM, sf wrote:
>> >>> On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 12:25:48 -0400, Dave Smith
>> >>> > wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> A couple of our resident rocket scientists thought they could slam
>> >>>> my
>> >>>> suggestion by pretending that I was suggesting doing it backwards.
>> >>>> Hence my short bus comment.
>> >>>
>> >>> No matter how you try to justify it, that was still a poorly written
>> >>> statement.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> The smarter people here had no trouble understanding it. Only you and
>> >> your friend Julie were confused. I know that Julie is not the
>> >> brightest
>> >> bulb on the tree tree but I had expected better from you.
>> >
>> > Too bad you get YOU get so confused so easily. I said it as a joke,
>> > because your writing was so completely muddled and incomprehensible.
>> > Others only went by what they commonly do, not by what you wrote. You
>> > flunked the writing test.
>> >
>>
>>
>> Oh? That was a joke. There is a remote possibility that it went over my
>> head, but it is much more likely that it wasn't much of a joke at all.
>> You wrote it as if it really sounded like I was was suggesting that the
>> plates would have to be washed before using them to slice the tomatoes.
>> The you and the Bobblehead patted each other on the back for your
>> silly excuse for a joke. As I wrote above, only you and Julie had
>> trouble with it.
>
> Writing for clarity has evaded you, dear boy. You're the one who is
> at fault - not me or Julie.
>
Right! Should have written something like... You have to take them from
the cupboard then wash them afterwards.