Michael Siemon wrote:
>
> In article >,
> (byakee) wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > I quoted the entire thread because I wanted to see where Nancy
> > complained that you offended *her*. She didn't. Why not accept
> > that she has a valid point without trying to get the last, rude
> > word?
> >
> > FWIW, the title didn't really bother me, but I can see how it
> > could upset others. Why go looking for a fight on Usenet? They'll
> > usually come right to you...
>
> Sigh. I tried to offer an oblique apology, and Nancy jumped
> all over me.
I most certainly did not. You might be a little touchy, when I
jump all over someone, it's not subtle.
> If she was _not_ offended, then her initial
> response seems to have been a bit otiose; why take offense
> on the part of some (unspecified) other? I am not trying to
> pick fights, but if she is determined to find me offensive,
Why would I, I don't even know you.
> then so be it -- I am not going to turn myself into a prissy
> twit just to satisfy her.
Well ... that's sort of determined already, but really ... you are
the one who offered to push all my hot buttons if I posted them.
You're the one who was offensive.
nancy