On 12/5/2013 11:47 AM, sf wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Dec 2013 11:11:47 -0700, "Pearl F. Buck"
> > wrote:
>
>> On 12/5/2013 11:03 AM, sf wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks, that could be a very expensive proposition considering the
>>> cost of city water these days and how it its increasing.
>>>
>> You had a major wildfire threat to your own municipal water supply this
>> summer, that had to be a bit tense.
>>
>
> It was touch & go for a while.
>
I would think that there is an opportunity for prescribed burns to
reduce future threats in the area of that one reservoir which was in danger.

Has that happened, or did enough material burn naturally to reduce
future risks?