On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:56:45 -0700, Dutch > wrote:

>dh@. wrote:
>> On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 15:09:18 -0700, Dutch > wrote:
>>
>>> dh@. wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 10:53:15 -0800, Dutch > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> dh@. wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 07 Mar 2013 14:45:07 -0800, Dutch > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 19:07:57 -0800, Dutch > wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> no thanks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> More evidence that you don't eat meat at all of course, but how do you want
>>>>>>>> to try to justify such an aversion for someone who actually does...as if you
>>>>>>>> actually do eat meat but have the aversion?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> moron
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL....even MORE evidence that you don't eat meat. You can't even think
>>>>>> about eating meat, even if it's never been part of a living animal. LOL...you
>>>>>> sure revealed yourself this time!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I take partial responsibility for the complete idiot you have
>>>>> degenerated into
>>>>
>>>> LOL!!!
>>>>
>>>>> , I have allowed you to get attention from it. Sorry, I
>>>>> was just having a little fun, and I really thought you would eventually
>>>>> wise up.
>>>>
>>>> Are you finally admitting to being the veg*n eliminationist we both know you
>>>> were and still are? I've been pointing out to you that I've been aware of it the
>>>> entire time. You never did start eating me like you so ****poorly try to pretend
>>>> you did. It's hard to imagine you finally being honest about even that one
>>>> thing...LOL...and maybe even harder for you to imagine it than it is for me.
>>>> Really though it seems like it should be a relief for you to finally tell the
>>>> truth about it unless you get some sort of good feeling about lying, which I
>>>> guess you must since you've been doing it for years and years...
>>>
>>> Part of me always hoped that a light bulb would eventually come on in
>>> your brain, but I haven't been holding my breath.
>>
>> That pretty much says you're admitting to being an eliminationist veg*n,
>> from my pov.
>>
>>> All things considered
>>> you have to be the dumbest **** I have ever come across.
>>
>> Since in over a decade you haven't been able to make any attempt to say how
>> you want people to think anti-consideration gives you more browny points than
>> having it, you're a dumber **** than I am.
>>
>> Also, let's keep in mind the fact that you being opposed to eating meat that
>> was never even part of an animal is MORE evidence that you never stopped being
>> whatever sort of veg*n you believe you "ethically" are. You clearly revealed you
>> revulsion to eating meat REGARDLESS of whether or not animals suffer to produce
>> it, and of course you'd be even more opposed to it if the animals enjoy lives of
>> positive value. That much we know since you're opposed to giving that aspect of
>> human influence on animals any consideration at all, much less would you want to
>> be a contributer to it.
>
>Yep

Then anyone reading can now accept the fact that you lied when you said you
began eating meat, and you lied when you claimed to have somehow changed your
pov about elimination instantly, completely, and for no apparent reason.