View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.animals.rights.promotion,soc.culture.usa
dh@. dh@. is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,652
Default Taco Bell Pulls Super Bowl Ad Making Fun of Veggie Eaters After Veggie Eaters Complain

On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 17:48:15 -0800, Goo lied:

>On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 18:48:50 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 12:00:05 -0800, Goo wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 14:31:15 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 18:03:40 -0800, Goo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 19:11:26 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 23:02:40 +0000, Derek > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>There's at least one more vegetarian I can think of who does a pretty
>>>>>>>good job in keeping that character group alive. He's Australian, you
>>>>>>>know. From a country that probably has one of the richest reserves of
>>>>>>>humour in the world.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There's an Australian clown here who claims to have a PhD in math yet can't
>>>>>>comprehend a simple aspect of life we discussed in class in grade school. In the
>>>>>>grade school I went to, he probably would have been in special ed:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"I don't believe the distinction between "lives of positive value" and
>>>>>>"lives of negative value" means anything." - Rupert
>>>>>>
>>>>>>unless he was lying when he wrote that. An indication that he was is that he
>>>>>>claimed to have been able to comprehend the distinction previous to his claim
>>>>>>that he can not:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"I said to David Harrison that there exist some farmed animals such
>>>>>>that it would be a better outcome for them to live the life they do
>>>>>>rather than for them not to live at all and for no animals to live
>>>>>>in their place." - Rupert
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Do you think it's likely that he could comprehend at one point, and then later
>>>>>>he unlearned? If so, how do you think he unlearned? If not, why do you think he
>>>>>>started lying about it?
>>>>>
>>>>>No,
>>>>
>>>> There's more to it than that Goob. Try again: Do you think it's likely that
>>>>Rupert could comprehend at one point, and then later he unlearned? If so, how do
>>>>you think he unlearned? If not, why do you think he started lying about it?
>>>
>>>There's nothing more to it than that

>>
>> Do you think it's likely that Rupert could comprehend at one point Goob, and
>>then later he unlearned? If so Goober, how do you think he unlearned? If not why
>>do you think he started lying about it, Goo?
>>
>>>>>you did not ever discuss in grade school how "getting to experience
>>>>>life" is a benefit.
>>>>
>>>> Goober we discussed slavery in the US and the fact that some slaves were
>>>>content with their lives meaning they had positive value to them and that other
>>>>slaves had lives which they considered to be good. We discussed the fact that
>>>>the value could and did change for them too Goo. We discussed that when they
>>>>became free they often couldn't find jobs so many agreed to stay on as slaves
>>>>until things changed over the years... We discussed more than that too Goo, like
>>>>that some people would remain slaves even when life was of negative value to
>>>>them pesonally, in the hopes that things would be better for their children. But
>>>>such details are necessarily beyond the mental ability of people who don't see
>>>>how life could ever be a benefit ...LOL... to anything. It's also beyond the
>>>>ability of someone who doesn't think the distinction between lives of positive
>>>>and negative value means anything, to appreciate how the difference between
>>>>lives of positive and negative value means anything, Goo. We were doing it by
>>>>the sixth grade Goober, but Dr. Rupert claims that he can't do it at all. He
>>>>claimed that he could in the past Goo, but has either unlearned or is still able
>>>>to do it while lying that he can't. Either way seems very stupid from my pov,
>>>>Goo.

>>. . .
>>>You did *NOT* ever talk about slaves "benefiting" from "getting to experience life.

>>. . .
>>>Every elementary school child in the US "discusses" that

>>
>> Yet your brother Dr. Rupert doesn't believe the distinction means anything,
>>meaning if so he's stupider than anyone in my grade school what wasn't in
>>special ed, and probably the special ed kids could understand it too.

>
>Actually, *Goo*, I'm the one who repeatedly assures you it doesn't mean
>anything.


You've never done that Goober. Try doing it now Goo. Go:

>>>, *Goo*. But
>>>*NONE* ever talk about the philosophical implication of whether or not
>>>they "benefited" by "getting to experience life."

>>
>> LOL!!! You sure are a stupid Goober to even let that possibility enter your
>>stupid little mind Goo, much less outstupid yourself by making such an absurdly
>>STUPID claim. LOL...to think that has never been discussed in an elementary
>>school is hilarious Goob, especially since we discussed it in some detail. Just
>>because you eliminationists can't think about it doesn't mean that most people
>>can't you idiot, and in fact from my experience most people CAN, Goo.

>
>LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Most people can Goob. ONLY eliminationists have been unable to do so in my
experience, Goo.