On 1/15/2013 12:44 PM, ****wit David Harrison - *Goo* - convicted felon
for dog fighting, lied:
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 13:13:43 -0800, George Pimpton wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:39:20 -0500, ****wit David Harrison - *Goo* - convicted felon for dog fighting, lied:
>>
>>> On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 15:47:35 -0800, George Pimpton wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 13:30:45 -0500, ****wit David Harrison - *Goo* - convicted felon for dog fighting, lied:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:07:12 -0700, Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:18:45 -0500, ****wit David Harrison - *Goo* - convicted felon for dog fighting, lied:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 14:49:11 -0700, Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 17:49:04 -0500, ****wit David Harrison - *Goo* - convicted felon for dog fighting, lied:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2013 10:20:06 -0700, Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 14:10:48 -0500, the following appeared
>>>>>>>>>> in sci.skeptic, ****wit David Harrison - *Goo* - convicted felon for dog fighting, lied:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:38:33 -0700, Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:40:25 -0500, the following appeared
>>>>>>>>>>>> in sci.skeptic, ****wit David Harrison - *Goo* - convicted felon for dog fighting, lied:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:54:59 -0700, probably Goo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 13:12:31 -0500, the following appeared
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in sci.skeptic, ****wit David Harrison - *Goo* - convicted felon for dog fighting, lied:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 11:40:21 -0800, George Pimpton wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You know that Bob is not me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IF "Bob" is not you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not, and I suspect that somewhere in that pea brain of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yours you know it,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL!!! There's no way I could know
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Granted, there's probably no way *you* could know it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hmmm. Since I've never known George to be that honest in over a dozen years of
>>>>>>>>>>> reading his lies, that's some evidence you're not George.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It wasn't a compliment or
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> LOL!!!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> anything similar, it was a note
>>>>>>>>>> regarding your many-times-demonstrated inabilities to
>>>>>>>>>> comprehend damn near anything.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Still you can't say what
>>>>>>>>>>> you want people to think is preventing life from being a benefit to you
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Already done so.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What do you want people to think is
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The fact that you think there's some
>>>>>>>>>> nebulous "benefit" in being born with a painful . . . A short life of nothing but pain
>>>>>>>>>> isn't a "benefit".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is yet more evidence that
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Your assertion was that "life is a benefit",
>>>>>>>> not that "one can benefit from life"; I certainly have no
>>>>>>>> argument with the latter.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Explain how you want people to think you
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No need;anyone with two neurons knows that prerequisites
>>>>>> for benefits are not in themselves automatically benefits.
>>>>>> Like "experiencing life", they may be neutral, with the
>>>>>> benefit only realized in the content. Your contention is
>>>>>> equivalent to claiming that receiving mail is a benefit,
>>>>>> even if the mail is a bomb or an envelope of anthrax.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And since you refuse to address the previous examples I gave
>>>>>> explaining exactly the answer you're *again* asking for, and
>>>>>> since I'm sure you'll do the same with this one, I'm through
>>>>>> trying to educate you.
>>>>>
>>>>> You have nothing to teach.
>>>>
>>>> He has attempted to teach you the truth - truth to which you deliberately blind yourself.
>>>
>>> How do you want us to think that
>> Existence - "getting to experience life" - is not a benefit
>
> Making that claim favors elimination ONLY Goober, and you can't even pretend
> it in any way favors AW.
>