On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 11:35:25 -0800, Goo wussed:

>On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:04:29 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 20:09:30 -0800, Dutch > wrote:
>>
>>>Lord Infomouse wrote:
>>>> On 12/24/2012 2:30 PM, dh@. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> They do Goob, even though they're not aware of the position
>>>>> they're in.
>>>>> LOL...and that particular fact is a very significant part OF their pov
>>>>> Goo. If
>>>>> they were aware of their own position it would be a lot different but
>>>>> they're
>>>>> not and you couldn't make them aware of it even if you tried, Goober.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's just very surprising that he would admit he doesn't care about
>>>>>>> the animals.
>>>>>>> I expect him to try lying that he actually does at some point, but
>>>>>>> then again he
>>>>>>> might be afraid to say anything more about it at all. No doubt he
>>>>>>> doesn't want
>>>>>>> to and that's why you being his brother have taken over for his lame
>>>>>>> ass. You
>>>>>>> people are pathetic Goob...amusing, but pathetic.
>>>>
>>>> Part of the problem that I see is that you have made Goober and Rupert
>>>> both your enemies, where Rupert is clearly much smarter than Goober and
>>>> more adept at argument. Goober likes to declare his opinion as fact and
>>>> a lot of people know that he is wrong. Rupert is just afraid to commit
>>>> to any term or phrase that hasn't been laid out well.
>>>
>>>Everybody who bothers to figure out what a load of bullshit he's pushing
>>>is his enemy.
>>
>> Rupert is bullshitting by claiming he can't comprehend the distinction
>>between lives of positive and negative value imo.
>
>What Woopert has said, correctly, is that you can't give any coherent
>meaning to "lives of possitive [sic] value" except to bullshit
>tautologically. That is completely true: all you can offer as
>explanation is that a life of possitive [sic] value is one that doesn't
>have too much negative value in it.

Negative value caused by what, Goo?

>>If not then he's mentally
>>restricted in ways that no one in my sixth grade class was, since we all could
>>do it in sixth grade. Since he's an eliminationist we know he like yourself is a
>>maniacal extremist. He takes the extreme of wanting to see all domestic animals
>>eliminated, yet can't comprehend a distinction between lives of positive and
>>negative value so he claims. That means he can't appreciate any distinction
>>between the value of life for livestock, humans, pets, or wildlife. IF that's
>>really the case then since he wants to see domestic animals eliminated and can't
>>appreciate any distinction between the value of life for them and wildlife it
>>seems he should also want the elimination of wildlife too. Since he can't
>>appreciate any distinction between the value of life for livestock and humans he
>>should also want the elimination of humans. Etc...
>
>There's that bullshit about your sixth grade class again;

It was either fifth or sixth grade Goob and I'm being overly generous by
saying it was sixth. LOL... I'm thinking how funny it would be if one of the
kids was as stupid as Rupert... If we studied it in sixth grade and discussed it
with fifth graders, if one of the fifth graders was so stupid that he "didn't
believe the distinction between "lives of positive value" and "lives of negative
value" means anything"", I wonder if word of his handicap and incredible
stupidity would become common knowledge around the school because he's so
different like a kid who can't speak English, or who is color blind, or walks
with a bad limp, etc.... He probably would and would be in special
ed...LOL...but here you people act like he's not stupid...LOL!!!...

>also bullshit
>about "mentally restricted."

Goober Rupert is either HORRIBLY restricted which could explain why he was
stupid enough to become a misnomer addict in the first place, or he's lying
about being that stupid and he's really not. If he's lying, then why Goo? If
he's not lying he's horribly restricted mentally. But Goob, he has shown signs
that he's not that stupid in the past, meaning it's almost certain that he's
lying now. So we're left with: Why is he lying Goob? Why is he lying to make
himself look more horribly stupid than he honestly is, Goo?

>You are the one suffering from a limited intellect. You are stupid.
>You are congenitally stupid, and as if that weren't bad enough, you're
>willfully even more stupid. You *choose* stupidity.

You're stupid enough to believe your pet food cow story Goober. If you were
stupid enough to believe it for years even with people pointing out your
mistake, and since you WERE then you still ARE now Goo. It's not like you got
less stupid Goob, even though after years of having it pointed out to you you
finally learned that there ARE NO pet food cattle much less any that are raised
for twelve years just for the purpose. MAYBE you finally learned that, but then
again maybe you still believe in them, Goo....you were stupid enough in the past
and are still as stupid as you were, so maybe you're stupid enough to STILL
believe in them.......

>> Goo lies that I'm a convicted felon. Goo lies that I don't consider quality
>>of life. Goo lies that I don't appreciate life for billions of livestock
>>animals. Goo claims life is not the benefit it so clearly appears to be, yet
>>can't even begin to pretend he has any clue what could prevent it from being one
>>(though he's revealed that he thinks it has something to do with the
>>pre-existent state). Goo claims to oppose the misnomer yet can never produce any
>>of his supposed opposition. Goo has suggested that there are multiple Ruperts
>>yet can't even pretend to explain what he thought he was trying to talk about.
>>Goo has insisted that some livestock are raised for no other reason than to
>>become pet food. Goo has lied that he was a Marine. Goo has lied more than once
>>that he has a PhD. Goo has dishonestly pretended to be dozens of different
>>people, often supporting and praising himselves while doing so. Etc...