On 2012-12-08 20:35:49 +0000, Bryan said:

> He seems like a decent guy, but he is about the worst excuse for a poet
> I've ever heard, and he is somehow under the illusion that he is funny.
> He's not.

He is. And there we have the basic rationale for plentiful art:
Differing needs.

Who would you consider a better poet for your amusement?