On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 10:13:01 -0700, Bob Casanova > wrote:

>On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:41:22 -0500, the following appeared
>in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:
>
>>On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:49:32 -0700, Bob Casanova > wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:59:53 -0400, the following appeared
>>>in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:26:24 -0700, Bob Casanova > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:42:55 -0400, the following appeared
>>>>>in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:
>>>
>>><snip>
>>>
>>>>>> I challenge you to try to help the Goober and/or "Bob" and/or yourself try
>>>>>>to explain what you think is preventing you from benefitting from your life. Go:
>>>
>>>>>Already been done, multiple times. And just as above, you
>>>>>snipped the explanation and pretended it didn't exist.
>>>>>You're an idiot.
>>>
>>>> Try presenting an example if you think you're aware of one.
>>>
>>>No examples exist of "benefitting solely from life", which
>>>is the point. Try to keep up, even if you are an idiot.
>
>> LOL!!! You proved yourself a liar then.
>
>You

I was hoping you could at least attempt to pretend you have some clue what
you want people to think is preventing you from benefitting from your life, but
you've proven to have no clue what you want people to think is preventing you.
That is YOUR fault. You can't support your own claim.

>. . .you tried
>to change how my reply would be read by snipping everything
>past "No examples exist".

LOL!!! You can produce no examples of anyone explaining what prevents
everyone from benefitting from their existence, which is what you're being
challenged to do and failing entirely.