On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:41:22 -0500, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:

>On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:49:32 -0700, Bob Casanova > wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:59:53 -0400, the following appeared
>>in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:
>>
>>>On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:26:24 -0700, Bob Casanova > wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:42:55 -0400, the following appeared
>>>>in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:
>>
>><snip>
>>
>>>>> I challenge you to try to help the Goober and/or "Bob" and/or yourself try
>>>>>to explain what you think is preventing you from benefitting from your life. Go:
>>
>>>>Already been done, multiple times. And just as above, you
>>>>snipped the explanation and pretended it didn't exist.
>>>>You're an idiot.
>>
>>> Try presenting an example if you think you're aware of one.
>>
>>No examples exist of "benefitting solely from life", which
>>is the point. Try to keep up, even if you are an idiot.

> LOL!!! You proved yourself a liar then.

You really do have a problem with logic and clear thought,
don't you? And also with honesty, considering that you tried
to change how my reply would be read by snipping everything
past "No examples exist". So you're not just an idiot,
you're a lying idiot.
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."

- McNameless