View Single Post
  #493 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,alt.agnosticism,alt.atheism,sci.skeptic
dh@. dh@. is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,652
Default Dietary ethics

On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 13:33:41 -0800, Goo wrote:

>On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:42:08 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 12:31:48 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 12:17:30 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:20:26 -0700, Dutch > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>dh@. wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 21:25:39 -0700, Dutch > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 16:17:18 -0700, Dutch > wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Goo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/19/2012 10:30 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:18:36 -0400, the following appeared
>>>>>>>>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ...do you have any clue at all?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And IronyMeters worldwide explode in flames...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It was like an electromagnetic pulse from an H-bomb - just fried all of
>>>>>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Our
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I challenge you to try to help the Goober and/or "Bob" and/or yourself try
>>>>>>>> to explain what you think is preventing you from benefitting from your life. Go:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The concept has no discernible meaning.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You lose.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I win.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's a blatant lie. You can't even pretend to make an attempt to win, much
>>>>>> less...LOL...can you actually do it. LOL...hilarious!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"benefitting from your life" has only a *rhetorical* meaning, literally,
>>>>>it is meaningless.
>>>>
>>>> So far you STILL appear to benefit from yours, and you can't even attempt to
>>>>explain what you want people to think is preventing you from doing so.
>>>
>>>No one "appears" to benefit from existence

>>
>> You do Goob. What do you want people to pretend is preventing you from
>>benefitting from yours Goober? We can't pretend that you don't if you can't say
>>what you want us to think is preventing you, and you can't. Proved, by YOU, Goo.

>
>No


Yes Goo, you have proved it consistently every time you've been challenged
about it. Try unproving it now Goo. Go: