FoodBanter.com - View Single Post

dh@.

On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 11:28:05 -0700, Goo lied amusingly:

>On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:19:06 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>Path: fastusenet.org!newsh.newsreader.com!newsh.newsread er.com!s09-01.readnews.com!transit4.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!s09-10.readnews.com!not-for-mail
>>From: dh@.
>>Newsgroups: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
>>Subject: ****wit David Harrison believes in time "travel" and voodoo
>>Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:19:06 -0400
>>Message-ID: >
>>References: > > > > > > >
>>X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 3.1/32.783
>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>Lines: 38
>>NNTP-Posting-Host: 164eb386.fastusenet.org
>>X-Trace: DXC=QdIN11Z9JI2S7UOg;WTTO6n<aeb7mYSc3h]]c\SKAo09Hm__55CUDd=K2fWgd6h;N;HfleXHWlDP?>B>MUa5lU 76==AJZ<l`Zk8DHf>1oYnTO>
>>X-Complaints-To:
>>Xref: fastusenet.org alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian:297853
>>
>>On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:43:24 -0700, Goo wussed exposing another lie:
>>
>>>On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:54:52 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:32:13 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 17:06:31 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 01:11:15 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On 10/11/2012 12:34 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Oct 10, 10:48 pm, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>>>> What a colossally stupid knuckle-dragging cracker ****wit he is!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Has it ever occurred to you that if someone's stupid, then that's not
>>>>>>>> their fault?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>It *is* ****wit David Harrison's fault that he's stupid. He *works* at
>>>>>>>being stupid. He doesn't have to do that; it's a choice. ****wit
>>>>>>>*chooses* to embrace stupidity. He has had countless people - including
>>>>>>>me - trying to point him toward knowledge, but he willfully and
>>>>>>>perversely chooses instead to embrace stupidity. His stupidity is 100%
>>>>>>>his own fault.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's your fault that you can't say what you want us to think is preventing
>>>>>>you from benefitting from your existence, or your life. It's also your fault
>>>>>>that you can't explain how you want us to think that anti-consideration is
>>>>>>superior to having consideration for the lives of livestock. Goo.
>>>>>
>>>>>Existence is not a benefit: proved.
>>>>
>>>> Present the proof or be AGAIN known a liar, Goo.
>>>
>>>I've stated it here numerous times, and you know what it is. Go try to
>>>waste someone else's time.
>>
>> LOL! Your inability to present the proof did AGAIN expose you as a liar,
>>Goo.
>
>No.

LOL!!!! Yes it did Goo, and you lying about it is only another example of
you outstupiding yourself even more. Hilarious!