Thread: TJ sucks, imo.
View Single Post
  #143 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
T[_5_] T[_5_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 720
Default TJ sucks, imo.

In article >, says...
>
> dsi1 wrote:
> > T wrote:
> >
> >> But I too am awaiting the high density batteries to come.

>
> As the range on a single charge goes from 200 to 400 miles electric cars
> go from not competing with gasoline power to direct competition. Below
> the range of 200 miles per charge most car owners will only have one as
> a second vehicle for a worker with a local commute. Above the range of
> 400 miles on a single charge the range advantage of gasoline gets very
> low. When on long trips I'll drive 500 miles per day but I rarely do
> trips that long as by that distance air travel starts to compete.
>
> > I don't believe that we'll be changing out our own battery packs because
> > the disposal and recycling of these things is a big tricky job.

>
> When Volkswagon came out the idea was shops would stock engines. When
> you took your car intot he shop they'd swap in one of the engines in
> stock and then they'd be able to work on the engine after you left then
> put it back into the cycle when their work was complete. Swapping out
> engines did not work in the long run. I figure history will repeat on
> this topic with batteries.


Interestingly the way modern cars are built you could do a powertrain
swap with relatively little effort. You do need a special lift but other
than that it's a few bolt and some connections to sever but drop out,
lift in.

> > What's
> > exciting is that getting high performance out of these motors is easy -
> > just add more batteries.

>
> More batteries gets more range. It's only one part of performance.


Yes indeed. The other thing about electric motors is that they are at
100% torque on power-up. Gasoline engines on the other hand has an
optimal power band where maximum torque is available.