****wit David Harrison, a convicted felon, lied:

>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Yes, it is the unborn animals that will be born..."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There's no such thing as "unborn animals" you moron.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ****wit thinks there are.
>>>>>
>>>>> "If there are pregnant animals, I can't see them"

Fake quote.


>>>
>>> Your first remark

What I said:

If there are pregnant animals, I can't see them, but at the end of
the gestational period, there will be new animals that I can see,
and whose welfare I can affect.


>> It is a complete quote and shows why the issue is not about unborn
>> animals currently being gestated by pregnant females.

>>> I challenge you

No.


>>>> Doesn't it make sense to plan for how to provide for those animals' welfare
>>>> before they are born?
>>>
>>> you have been manically OPPOSING giving consideration to both
>>> existing livestock and potential future livestock for over a decade.
>>
>> Yes, because their lives deserve no moral consideration until they
>> exist, and then *only* the welfare of their lives, not the "getting to
>> experience life."
>
> ONLY eliminationists have reaon to oppose considering their lives

There is *nothing* to consider until they exist.