On 8/1/2012 9:03 PM, Dutch wrote:
> Rupert wrote:
>> On 31 Jul., 20:42, Dutch > wrote:
>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>> So what's your explanation for why he claims he doesn't think it?
>>>
>>> When it's laid out for him in simple terms he realizes how idiotic it
>>> sounds so he can't say he believes it.
>>>
>>> But then he proceeds to attack vegans, "eliminationists", for their
>>> failure to provide the opportunity for animals to experience "decent
>>> AW".
>>>
>>> He's not bright enough to realize that by doing so he is admitting that
>>> he implicitly believes that non-existent animals can "lose" something.
>>
>> It's one thing to claim he's being inconsistent; that's different from
>> claiming that he's lying about what he thinks.
>>
>
> He's inconsistent and a liar too. For example he claims to believe that
> Jonathan Ball and I are vegans ("eliminationists"). It is not plausible
> to me that even he could actually believe that. I think that means he's
> lying, unless you have another explanation.

****wit doesn't believe it. He's lying when he says we are. Woopert
knows it, too - he knows ****wit is lying.