Dietary ethics
dh@. wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 12:20:52 -0700, Dutch > wrote:
>
>> dh@. wrote:
>>> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 13:30:08 -0700, Dutch lied:
>>>
>>>> dh@. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I showed that you only want to consider bad things because and only because
>>>>> considering positive aspects for millions of livestock animals works against the
>>>>> elimination objective, Goo.
>>>>
>>>> Aside from battery hens, *you* only want to consider the good. You're
>>>> just as nonobjective as ARAs, in fact you're worse.
>>>
>>> There's no way that's true, so you're lying blatantly again. Not only are
>>> you lying blatantly, but you also have no idea which other lives I might believe
>>> are most often of negative value, if any.
>>
>> So list them.
>
<blah blah>
now stfu
|