gtr wrote:

> >> Can you give me a believable reason that the overwhelming majority of
> >> related sciences would lie about scientific findings, year after year,
> >> as a conspiracy across myriad organizations, continents, languages,
> >> etc. What is their financial motive?
> >
> > funding.
>
> Fair enough, now finish the sentence. In what way is their funding
> related to their findings as negative to industry? If their findings
> related some other kind of way to you think we would should down
> meteorological science. And why would that be?
>
> That is, how is their funding predicated on the conclusions they are reaching?

I believe you've missed the subtext. You see, in the anti-science
worldview, any and all organizations that promulgate information are
automatically assumed to be biased. There is no such thing as
knowledge for the sake of knowledge because there is no actual
knowledge. (The word "science" comes from the Greek word for
knowledge.) The right-wing propaganda factories are in the business of
attacking the existence of knowledge. They are feeding ignorance to
the ignorant, and the ignorant have an insatiable appetite for it.
They can't hear often enough that every fact is a lie, every truth is
a distortion. That's how they justify the nonsense that "creationism"
and natural selection are "equally valid viewpoints" that explain
evolution.