On 2012-06-04 02:56:10 +0000, Pico Rico said:

> "gtr" > wrote in message news:2012060317561823604-xxx@yyyzzz...
>> Pete C. wrote:
>>
>>> Sounds very much like the proponents of global warming/ man made climate
>>> change when confronted with the fact that there is little or no evidence
>>> to support their claims.
>>
>> I'm reminded: Republicans eschew, on behalf of their evangelical
>> contingent, the age of the earth, they've rejected carbon dating to
>> help us get to some half-baked Biblical age of earth.
>>
>> They reject all kinds of economic principles, always supporting the
>> view that shoveling money to their donors creates jobs. No statistics
>> support that. There is not an economic principle they haven't rejected
>> when it wasn't to their advantage. Similarly they endlessly reject
>> American history as proofs of anything: Stimulus got us out of a
>> Depression, for instance.
>>
>> They reject the science of evolution. They reject statistics--note how
>> they rejected statistical sampling from the census, And reject any poll
>> that doesn't support their political intent. The rejection of science
>> is a defining aspect of their ideology.
>>
>> So: Why would we consider their scientific evaluation of global warming data?
>
> ALL Republicans? that is a might broad brush you are painting with
> fella. And non-Republicans don't "reject" things as well? pfft.

No, just the ones that represent Republican idelology in the media and
in congress. They are proud of marching lock step, a top down ideology.
When I contest some of these issues with Republican friends I find the
ideas they dogma they don't seem to agree with they simply won't talk
about. Hardly a vote of their "acceptance".