"gtr" > wrote in message news:2012060317561823604-xxx@yyyzzz...
> Pete C. wrote:
>
>> Sounds very much like the proponents of global warming/ man made climate
>> change when confronted with the fact that there is little or no evidence
>> to support their claims.
>
> I'm reminded: Republicans eschew, on behalf of their evangelical
> contingent, the age of the earth, they've rejected carbon dating to help
> us get to some half-baked Biblical age of earth.
>
> They reject all kinds of economic principles, always supporting the view
> that shoveling money to their donors creates jobs. No statistics support
> that. There is not an economic principle they haven't rejected when it
> wasn't to their advantage. Similarly they endlessly reject American
> history as proofs of anything: Stimulus got us out of a Depression, for
> instance.
>
> They reject the science of evolution. They reject statistics--note how
> they rejected statistical sampling from the census, And reject any poll
> that doesn't support their political intent. The rejection of science is a
> defining aspect of their ideology.
>
> So: Why would we consider their scientific evaluation of global warming
> data?

ALL Republicans? that is a might broad brush you are painting with fella.
And non-Republicans don't "reject" things as well? pfft.