On May 18, 5:26*am, Bryan > wrote:
> On May 17, 3:29*pm, spamtrap1888 > wrote:
>
> > On May 17, 12:53*pm, "Malcom \"Mal\" Reynolds" <atlas-
>
> > > wrote:
> > > I'm sure that there is the equivalent for pork and chicken, why no outrage?
>
> > Who eats ground pork? And, unlike cattle, chickens do not contain any
> > mostly fatty lumps with a little meat inside.
>
> > Further, while ground pork is used in a variety of sausages, if pink
> > slime went only into hot dogs, who would know?
>
> Beef bologna. *http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dO5KoBHto80
>
>
>
> > > But I'm glad the outrage worked. It's the best thing to happen to cattle
> > > ranchers and it does show that the free market does indeed work
>
> > It's going to go into dog food, that's for sure. Maybe end up being
> > fed to cattle or pigs. Just because something's not fit for human
> > consumption doesn't mean it will go to waste.
>
> It was never unfit for human consumption. *It just shouldn't have been
> added to fresh ground beef.
>
I should have put that phrase in scare quotes then. If pink slime is
fit for human consumption, why all the uproar?

Why didn't they just take the trimmings and grind them in, instead of
ammoniating them and everything? They could have trimmed out some of
the other fat, pregrind.