On May 17, 3:29*pm, spamtrap1888 > wrote:
> On May 17, 12:53*pm, "Malcom \"Mal\" Reynolds" <atlas-
>
> > wrote:
> > I'm sure that there is the equivalent for pork and chicken, why no outrage?
>
> Who eats ground pork? And, unlike cattle, chickens do not contain any
> mostly fatty lumps with a little meat inside.
>
> Further, while ground pork is used in a variety of sausages, if pink
> slime went only into hot dogs, who would know?

Beef bologna. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dO5KoBHto80
>
> > But I'm glad the outrage worked. It's the best thing to happen to cattle
> > ranchers and it does show that the free market does indeed work
>
> It's going to go into dog food, that's for sure. Maybe end up being
> fed to cattle or pigs. Just because something's not fit for human
> consumption doesn't mean it will go to waste.

It was never unfit for human consumption. It just shouldn't have been
added to fresh ground beef.

--Bryan