|
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,alt.food.vegan.science,talk.politics.animals
|
|
|
Squaring the Irrational Search for Micrograms with "vegan" do-nothingism
On 4/8/2012 1:48 AM, Rupert wrote:
> On Apr 7, 6:02 pm, George > wrote:
>> On 4/7/2012 1:32 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>> On Apr 7, 12:18 am, George > wrote:
>>>> On 4/6/2012 12:19 PM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>> [steaming load snipped]
>>
>>>> Why do all "vegans" spend a huge amount of time searching for micrograms
>>>> of animal bits to get out of their diet, and no time whatever trying to
>>>> determine what the lowest-harm fruits and vegetables are?
>>
>>> Not all vegans do that.
>>
>> *ALL* "vegans" do it. Stop bullshitting.
>>
>> *NO* "vegan" tries to find the least-harm fruit and vegetable produce;
>> *all* engage in a continual, silly, absurd effort to get micrograms of
>> animal parts out of their diets and "lifestyles".
>>
>
> How did you come by evidence for this
"vegans" present it to me.
>>>> Why would any rational person take such absurd satisfaction in learning
>>>> about the minute part of an anchovy that's in a bottle of Worcestershire
>>>> sauce and thus stop buying one bottle a year, versus finding some grain
>>>> to substitute for a known lethal product like rice?
>>
>>> No rational person who was aware of the harm associated with rice
>>> would do that, obviously.
>>
>> Most "vegans" eat rice. http://tinyurl.com/cx9fedr
You're ****ed.
|