View Single Post
  #26 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,alt.food.vegan.science,talk.politics.animals
George Plimpton George Plimpton is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,258
Default Squaring the Irrational Search for Micrograms with "vegan" do-nothingism

On 4/7/2012 11:29 PM, Rupert wrote:
> On Apr 7, 6:03 pm, George > wrote:
>> On 4/7/2012 1:33 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Apr 6, 10:44 pm, > wrote:
>>>> > wrote

>>
>>>>> What do you suppose would motivate the search if they didn't believe
>>>>> (falsely) that it was the best way of trying to reduce harm to
>>>>> animals? How would you make sense of what they are doing if they
>>>>> didn't have that belief?

>>
>>>> They believe that by being vegan they achieve a certain moral standing and
>>>> by consuming any animal parts at all they are tainted and that moral
>>>> standing is threatened. They perceive it as the idea being "repulsive" or
>>>> something to that effect.

>>
>>> How would they be able to sustain the belief that they thereby obtain
>>> a certain moral standing if they didn't believe that that was the best
>>> way to reduce harm to animals?

>>
>> Your question is absurd. Their belief about the effect and sufficiency
>> of "veganism" is false, and therefore so is their belief about their
>> moral standing.

>
> But they do have the belief,


It's nothing but a façade; completely unreal. All they really have is
their own ego. All they care about is themselves.