View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,alt.food.vegan,alt.food.vegan.science
Rupert Rupert is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,380
Default "vegan" arrogance and egotism

On Mar 23, 7:25*am, George Plimpton > wrote:
> On 3/22/2012 11:04 PM, Rupert wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 23, 6:55 am, George > *wrote:
> >> On 3/22/2012 10:27 PM, Rupert wrote:

>
> >>> On Mar 23, 2:33 am, George > * *wrote:
> >>>> A typical "vegan" tries to argue "Why vegans are simply better people."http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=226259

>
> >>>> All "vegans" believe that. *Woopert is lying when he says he doesn't.

>
> >>> What do you suppose would motivate me to lie about it?

>
> >> Because you know that bragging that your character is better than that
> >> of others, particularly on such an inflammatory and contentious topic as
> >> not putting animal parts in your mouth, is going to generate a lot of
> >> well-founded criticism, and you don't want to have to defend yourself
> >> against the charge of placing yourself on a moral pedestal, so you just
> >> lie. *But you *do* think you're "simply better" than those who use
> >> animal products.

>
> > You say that I am aware that the critcism would be "well-founded".

>
> No, I say it is well-founded, and it would be, because bragging about
> being better, even if an objective case can be made that one is better,
> is still disparaged.
>
> It doesn't matter if you know it would be well-founded or not. *You *do*
> know that the criticism would ensue, so to avoid it you lie and claim
> not to believe what you obviously *do* believe.
>
> > If I know that the criticism would be well-founded, wouldn't this lead
> > me to critically re-examine the belief?

>
> The criticism would be for the bragging, you stupid ****wit. *You know this.
>
> The simple fact is, you do believe you're "better" than meat eaters
> based on what you don't put in your mouth.


I don't really think, in general, it is meaningful to say that one
person is "better" than another. I'm with the followers of the school
of Rational Emotive Behavioural Therapy on this one. You can't
meaningfully compare two different people. You can compare specific
behaviours in various respects: you can say, for example, that one
behaviour is less conducive towards more suffering taking place than
another.