On 3/21/2012 12:22 PM, Rupert wrote:
> On Mar 21, 8:14 pm, George > wrote:
>> On 3/21/2012 12:02 PM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 21, 8:00 pm, George > wrote:
>>>> On 3/21/2012 11:40 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>> On Mar 21, 7:36 pm, George > wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/21/2012 10:59 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 6:13 pm, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 3/21/2012 9:27 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>> On 21 Mrz., 17:19, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 3/21/2012 9:12 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 21 Mrz., 15:55, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/21/2012 12:08 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 7:58 am, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/20/2012 11:53 PM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 7:36 pm, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/20/2012 10:03 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 5:38 pm, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/20/2012 8:44 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 4:13 pm, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/19/2012 10:31 PM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 7:27 pm, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/19/2012 9:39 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 4:29 pm, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 11:37 PM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 7:15 am, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 11:07 PM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 6:13 am, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 8:09 PM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 6:16 pm, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 1:07 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 2:33 am, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 3:33 PM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 8:00 pm, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 8:33 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exaltation and sanctimony.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is inherently ugly, and
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There isn't any such authentic desire. It's really all about the ego
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and self-image of the so-called "vegan".
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This belief of yours strikes me as irrational.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it doesn't. You just say that to try to deflect attention from you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> own ego gratification and self-exaltation.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How exactly do you think I am trying to exalt myself
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Believing that you're "better" than omnivores based on what you don't eat.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You do.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you think that?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ask pointless questions?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I asked the question because I was curious to know the answer.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Really?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Really!?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes. Do you perhaps have some alternative explanation in mind?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't seem very willing to share your thoughts with me at the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You didn't ask me to share them - you just asked me if I had any.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, I would be interested to hear what the alternative explanation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is that you have in mind, if you care to share it.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll give some consideration (!) to sharing it.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, I hope you will share it, because the chances are it will be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amusingly stupid.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it almost certainly would not be.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Presumably you know what alternative explanation you have in mind of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> why I asked the question.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> When you say that it "almost certainly would
>>>>>>>>>>>>> not be" amusingly stupid, does that mean that there is some doubt in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> your mind about the matter?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No.- Zitierten Text ausblenden -
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> - Zitierten Text anzeigen -
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Then why do you say "almost certainly" as opposed to "certainly"?
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Are you teaching beginning algebra in Germany?- Zitierten Text ausblenden -
>>
>>>>>>>>>> - Zitierten Text anzeigen -
>>
>>>>>>>>> No, I'm not doing any teaching, why?
>>
>>>>>>>> Then how are you ****ing away your time in Germany?
>>
>>>>>>> Doing research on topological twin buildings and topological groups.
>>
>>>>>> So, the telemarketing job was a bust, eh?
>>
>>>>> I don't know why you keep carrying on about that telemarketing job.
>>
>>>> I thought it suited you.
>>
>>> You think a lot of things.
>>
>> Yes, and nearly all of them are high-quality thoughts. Among them are
>> what an arrogant and egotistical goof you are.
>
> A lot of people who know me better than you do don't think I'm
> arrogant and egotistical.

I'm sure a lot of people think ****wit makes perfect sense, too.