On Mar 15, 2:51*am, "Dutch" > wrote:
> >Rupert" > wrote
> > On Mar 14, 10:04 pm, "Dutch" > wrote:
> >> One compelling argument that you have definitely seen was given in great
> >> detail in the vegan shuffle argument.
>
> > Perhaps you can tell me which one you have in mind.
>
> The "shuffle". The vegan's core belief is that by going vegan one is no
> longer complicit in animal suffering. When the fallaciousness of that belief
> is pointed out to them they start shuffling. This takes various forms, such
> as a retreat to the "less suffering" position or a switch to the "injustice"
> position.

How is that evidence that the motivation for going vegan is not to
help animals?