On Mar 8, 7:05*pm, George Plimpton > wrote:
> On 3/8/2012 9:42 AM, Rupert wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 8, 5:47 pm, George > *wrote:
> >> On 3/8/2012 8:22 AM, Rupert wrote:
>
> >>> On Mar 8, 5:10 pm, George > * *wrote:
> >>>> On 3/8/2012 8:09 AM, Rupert wrote:
>
> >>>>> On Mar 8, 4:50 pm, George > * * *wrote:
> >>>>>> On 3/8/2012 12:18 AM, Rupert wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> On Mar 7, 8:21 pm, George > * * * *wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 3/7/2012 11:10 AM, Glen wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>> On 07/03/2012 17:17, George Plimpton wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On 3/7/2012 8:56 AM, Rupert wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> flushed
> >>>>>>>>>>> If you don't think that your contribution to global warming violates
> >>>>>>>>>>> human rights, then how do you figure Glen is violating the polar
> >>>>>>>>>>> bears' rights?
>
> >>>>>>>>>> When did I suggest he was violating the polar bears' *rights*?
>
> >>>>>>>>> You implied it asshole.
>
> >>>>>>>> I didn't, you cocksucker.
>
> >>>>>>> If you didn't want to imply that,
>
> >>>>>> I didn't, and nothing I wrote suggested I did.
>
> >>>>> Yes, the context of what you wrote suggested that
>
> >>>> No, I didn't suggest that at all.
>
> >>> You yourself didn't suggest it, but
>
> >> So, that topic is finished.
>
> > Here is the original question which you snipped and refused to answer:
>
> > If you didn't want to imply that, then what was the point of pointing
> > out that he was contributing to polar bears' deaths?
>
> Because it's not in their interest to die, and if we do something that
> causes their death, or loss of habitat leading to a reduction in the
> satisfaction of their interests, then we bear moral responsibility for
> it. *We may not decide to alter our course of action, but we can't
> pretend we don't bear that moral responsibility. *"mark" or "glen" or
> "karen winter" or "lesley simon" or whoever that ****ing retard is
> cannot claim not to be morally responsible.

And if the Pacific Islands end up completely submerged so that many
people are turned into destitute environmental refugees (and it's also
not especially realistic to think that it wouldn't be the case that
some people would die), then you cannot claim not to have a share in
the moral responsibility for that.