On Mar 8, 5:47*pm, George Plimpton > wrote:
> On 3/8/2012 8:22 AM, Rupert wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 8, 5:10 pm, George > *wrote:
> >> On 3/8/2012 8:09 AM, Rupert wrote:
>
> >>> On Mar 8, 4:50 pm, George > * *wrote:
> >>>> On 3/8/2012 12:18 AM, Rupert wrote:
>
> >>>>> On Mar 7, 8:21 pm, George > * * *wrote:
> >>>>>> On 3/7/2012 11:10 AM, Glen wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> On 07/03/2012 17:17, George Plimpton wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 3/7/2012 8:56 AM, Rupert wrote:
> >>>>>>> flushed
> >>>>>>>>> If you don't think that your contribution to global warming violates
> >>>>>>>>> human rights, then how do you figure Glen is violating the polar
> >>>>>>>>> bears' rights?
>
> >>>>>>>> When did I suggest he was violating the polar bears' *rights*?
>
> >>>>>>> You implied it asshole.
>
> >>>>>> I didn't, you cocksucker.
>
> >>>>> If you didn't want to imply that,
>
> >>>> I didn't, and nothing I wrote suggested I did.
>
> >>> Yes, the context of what you wrote suggested that
>
> >> No, I didn't suggest that at all.
>
> > You yourself didn't suggest it, but
>
> So, that topic is finished.

Here is the original question which you snipped and refused to answer:

If you didn't want to imply that, then what was the point of pointing
out that he was contributing to polar bears' deaths?

Maybe we could have an answer to the question.