"glen" or "mark" or "little cocksucker" - friend of Lesley Simon, the
Whore of Ballaghaderreen, County Roscommon - bullshitted:

> On 07/03/2012 20:10, George Plimpton wrote:
>> "glen" or "mark" or "little cocksucker" - friend of Lesley Simon, the
>> Whore of Ballaghaderreen, County Roscommon - bullshitted:
>>


>>>>>>> An experiment tested three hypotheses about the conditions under
>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>> someone can be held vicariously responsible for the actions of
>>>>>>> another. Two of the hypotheses received empirical support: that the
>>>>>>> vicariously responsible person is in a superior relationship to the
>>>>>>> person who caused the damage and is able to control that person's
>>>>>>> causing of the damage]
>>>>>>> http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/1...70314/abstract
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Repeating it won't get around the fact that they did not say
>>>>>> "iff", and
>>>>>> that it guts your view on vicarious moral responsibility.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, the article stands on its own without any input from me, and
>>>>> it guts your view on vicarious moral responsibility, rather.
>>>>
>>>> The article in no way supports your claim
>>>
>>> Yes it does little fish.
>>
>> No, it doesn't, little cocksucker friend of the Whore of
>> Ballaghaderreen, County Roscommon. Derek is claiming, correctly, that
>> you don't have "control" over the actions of your agent.
>
> St. Derek is correct.

Derek is wrong, "mark" or "glen" or "little cocksucker" or whoever you
are this week.


> My independent contractor

You have no need of one, "mark" or "glen" or "little cocksucker" or
whoever you are this week. Because you *choose* to hire one repeatedly,
voluntarily, actively and unnecessarily, you incur moral liability for
the CDs he causes, "mark" or "glen" or "little cocksucker" or whoever
you are this week. This is settled.