On 3/6/2012 11:16 PM, Rupert wrote:
> On Mar 6, 4:52 pm, George > wrote:
>> On 3/6/2012 12:46 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 5, 4:42 pm, George > wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It's an insincere and time-wasting question.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So you appear to believe.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Because it is.
>>
>>>>>>>>> You reckon?
>>
>>>>>>>> Guaranteed.
>>
>>>>>>> How do you know?
>>
>>>>>> I have lots of experience with your insincerity and time-wasting efforts.
>>
>>>>> I don't believe that I have any way of knowing how the number of
>>>>> premature deaths caused per calorically equivalent serving of tofu
>>>>> compares with that for grass-fed beef or wild-caught fish.
>>
>>>> You know, intuitively and based on plausibility, that raising the
>>>> vegetable crops you would have to substitute in order to get equivalent
>>>> nutrition causes multiple CDs, and that 100% grass-fed beef or
>>>> wild-caught fish causes none.
>>
>>> No. I don't know that my expected contribution to collateral deaths by
>>> buying one serving of tofu is greater than one.
>>
>> Of course you do. You can't *NOT* know it.
>
> On the basis of what evidence do I know it?

Sorry, Woopert - we've been over all this before, and now you're just
trying to refight battles you've already lost.