On Feb 1, 5:53*pm, sf > wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 16:33:13 -0800 (PST), merryb >
> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 1, 3:42*pm, sf > wrote:
> > > On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:17:59 -0800 (PST), merryb >
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > You are kidding, right? Didn't you bitch to me recently about posting
> > > > untested recipes? I know you did, but you post so much and contradict
> > > > yourself *that I'm sure you don't recall.
>
> > > If you think I did that, prove it.
>
> > I have better things to do!
>
> Then you shouldn't have brought it up. *Don't go around slinging lies
> about me. *I may have defended untested recipes, because I am fine
> with reading and rejecting - but I don't care if they are tested or
> not. *I'm not a slave to the written recipe. *I can read them and know
> if I can make it as is or if I need to fiddle a little with it a
> little... or reject it entirely. *Not my taste doesn't mean nobody
> else will like it based on the recipes that are continually
> regurgitated and praised here over the years.
>
> I don't know what I've done to get on your ****y side, but you need to
> kill file me.
>
> --
>
> Tell congress not to censor the web. *Add your voice here.https://www.google.com/landing/takeaction/

You are over reacting to this, and I don't have the time or desire to
argue with you. You did state that this was an untested recipe, and
I'm still unsure why you posted it. If I am going to take the time to
post a recipe, I use one that I have tried at least a few times and
have been satisfied with the results.