On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:11:00 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:

>
>
><dh@.> wrote in message ...
>> On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 15:04:19 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 15:27:32 -0800, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 16:12:15 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>><dh@.> wrote in message
om...
>>>>>> On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 13:54:18 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>My objection to ...[having appreciation for when decent AW results in
>>>>>>>lives of positive value for livestock] is that it is a circular,
>>>>>>>irrational, self-serving and weak position to assume.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ONLY from an eliminationist pov.
>>>>>
>>>>>No
>>>>
>>>> Yes. We've seen that to be the case.
>>>
>>>No
>>
>> Yes. We've seen that ONLY eliminationists have reason to oppose
>> [having appreciation for when decent AW results in lives of positive value
>> for livestock.]
>
>That's a lie and you know it.

LOL. No doubt you would like everyone to believe that some people who are in
favor of AW over elimination are opposed to having appreciation for when decent
AW results in lives of positive value for livestock...LOL! Just describing your
position is hilarious!