On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 19:29:26 -0800, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>
>"Evelyn" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 19:20:53 -0800, "Julie Bove"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"W. Baker" > wrote in message
...
>>>> Julie Bove > wrote:
>>>>
>>>> : "BlueBrooke" > wrote in message
>>>> : ...
>>>> : > On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 09:32:37 -0800, "Cheri" >
>>>> : > wrote:
>>>> : >
>>>> : >>I find it really odd (well perhaps not so odd) that some people
>>>> would
>>>> take
>>>> : >>exception to the "it" when it was obvious what you meant, but even
>>>> if
>>>> it
>>>> : >>wasn't obvious that you meant it that way, I guess the liberal use
>>>> of
>>>> FOAD
>>>> : >>is exempt from a "horrible thing to say to someone?" Shaking my head
>>>> at
>>>> : >>that
>>>> : >>one.
>>>> : >>
>>>> : >>Cheri
>>>> : >
>>>> : > I don't find any of this "odd" at all. Robert walked right into the
>>>> : > same mine field everyone else has at one point or another, and the
>>>> : > response was as expected. And the responses to the responses were
>>>> as
>>>> : > expected. :-) There's really nothing new here -- except maybe the
>>>> : > huge jump to make an insult out of that silly "it" thing. This kind
>>>> : > of dust-up happens once a year or so.
>>>> : >
>>>> : > The only thing I found surprising was the statement that no one
>>>> knows
>>>> : > Julie -- taken slightly out of context here because, of course, no
>>>> one
>>>> : > can really "know" anyone -- but I was under the impression that
>>>> : > several people in this group had met her? Maybe it was Alan during
>>>> : > his travels?
>>>>
>>>> : I have met no one from this group. I was going to meet Loretta when I
>>>> live
>>>> : in NY and that never happened.
>>>>
>>>> : As to Robert, I *still* don't know what it was that he thought was of
>>>> : interest to me. I asked several times and instead of anyone pointing
>>>> out
>>>> : what exactly it was I was supposed to have seen, I was just attacked
>>>> again
>>>> : and again. And of course Robert remained silent. But as Robert
>>>> always
>>>> : does, he will come back weeks or months from now and reply and then
>>>> stir
>>>> : things up again.
>>>>
>>>> I would think that Robert thought one of 2 things. Either that you
>>>> would
>>>> be interested in something to do with gastroparesis or that jan's post
>>>> about a friend who used lots of pureed foods, partcularly meat, which
>>>> people with gastorparesis (as you have often stated) have trouble
>>>> digesting might interest you. I don't see why , if solid meat is a
>>>> problem that makign soupy pureed meat and vegetables wouldn' always be a
>>>> good idea for gastroparesis eve if all foods do not need to be pureed.
>>>> You stated that you were ast a uree stage or shomething like that, so
>>>> why
>>>> would you be interested? Well, those of us without gastroparesis would
>>>> have no way of knowing that unless we researched the condition before
>>>> posting either an article or a someting about a friend with the problem
>>>> adn how she worked with it.
>>>
>>>The diet that Jan referred to is the stage one diet. I am waaay beyond
>>>that. I believe there are four stages of diets. Maybe only three. But
>>>for
>>>me to be on stage one at this point would be just plain silly!
>>>
>>>I don't use a puree of anything except for in my meatloaf. And that is
>>>not
>>>for me. That is because Angela and my husband do not like chunks of
>>>vegetables in their meatloaf. And I use baby food squash as a replacement
>>>for eggs because I am allergic to eggs.
>>>>
>>>> Roberet, who lived in a supportive envireonment because of his strokes,
>>>> seems to have very spotty internet connection and often posts aboaut
>>>> stuff
>>>> that hhas long been dropped by the rest of us, but he is nly ust seeing
>>>> it
>>>> for the first time. i believe that is why he often doesn't answer
>>>> immedietly.
>>>>
>>>> Wendy
>>>
>>>Okay...
>>>
>>>Still, it would have been the nice thing to do for someone to have pointed
>>>that out to me in the beginning instead of just attacking me and attacking
>>>me and attacking me and that was what was done.
>>>
>>>However, I have now learned that several people here are not nice and I
>>>will
>>>not expect any nice things out of them.
>>
>>
>> I always believe in using ones killfile. Some people are just not
>> helpful.
>
>Yep. I did clean out my killfile recently. Some of these people were in
>there. I may well put them back.


A good plan if you find they are too upsetting to read!

Evelyn