"Evelyn" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 19:16:08 -0800, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>"Evelyn" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:57:55 -0800, "Julie Bove"
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Evelyn" > wrote in message
m...
>>>>> On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:42:59 -0800, "Julie Bove"
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Evelyn" > wrote in message
>>>>>>news:112ag7tbu4ga5v94g5i28tu0gjn7cb96as@4ax. com...
>>>>>>> On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 12:01:45 +1000, "Ozgirl"
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>> "Ozgirl" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Cheri" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>> "Evelyn" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>> "All unhappiness is due to the ego; with it comes all your
>>>>>>>>>>>> trouble.
>>>>>>>>>>>> What does it avail you to attribute to the happenings in life
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> cause of misery which is really within you? What happiness can
>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>>> from things extraneous to yourself ? When you get it, how long
>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>> last ?" -- Ramana Maharshi
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Self-pity is our worst enemy and if we yield to it, we can never
>>>>>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>>>>>> anything wise in this world.
>>>>>>>>>>> ~Helen Keller
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This is all getting beyond a joke, you all need to take a good
>>>>>>>>>> look
>>>>>>>>>> at yourselves, this kind of behaviour towards a fellow human
>>>>>>>>>> being
>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>> shameful. I wouldn't treat a dog in this manner.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No you wouldn't treat a dog that way, but you and Julie treat
>>>>>>>>> Susan
>>>>>>>>> that way every chance you get, and I never see a word from you
>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>> the FOAD that Julie is throwing around all the time. Preacher,
>>>>>>>>> take
>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> good look at yourself before taking others to task.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Susan is not a saint and never will be. She makes unprovoked attacks
>>>>>>>>at
>>>>>>>>every opportunity and she gets back what she gives out. You do know
>>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>difference between people tit for tatting with Susan and the
>>>>>>>>behaviour
>>>>>>>>of many shown towards Julie.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> NONE of us are saints, neither Susan nor Julie or you or I. There
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> no mistaking the term FOAD. It means **** off and die. Not nice
>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>> any means!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I hope this nasty stuff gets settled soon!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Peace!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>And it wasn't meant to be nice. I am not a doormat. And I am not
>>>>>>here
>>>>>>to
>>>>>>be verbally abused over and over again. Seems many people here seem
>>>>>>to
>>>>>>think it is okay to do it to me. Ah but when I do it to them? Well!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Julie, we cannot possibly control other people, but if you think to
>>>>> yourself, "what will be the result of telling someone to **** off and
>>>>> die, will it bring peace? Will it escalate the problems? Will it
>>>>> help anyone? Will it help me?"...... I think you will discover that
>>>>> the answer to all of those questions is "no".
>>>>>
>>>>Perhaps as a Buddhist you are here to bring peace. I am not.
>>>>
>>>>Did their attacks help me? No. In fact I *still* don't know which post
>>>>was
>>>>the post that was supposed to be helpful to me. That is how this all
>>>>started. Robert Miles left me a vague message and pinged me about it.
>>>>He
>>>>didn't tell me specifically which one it was. And when I said I
>>>>couldn't
>>>>find a post that was helpful to me, instead of someone pointing out
>>>>where
>>>>or
>>>>what this post was, they just started attacking me and telling me I was
>>>>ungrateful!
>>>>
>>>>> We all get on one anothers nerves from time to time. You and I had a
>>>>> few words a while back and I was sorry that it happened and we both
>>>>> made some effort to smooth it all over.
>>>>>
>>>>> That needs to happen in this instance too, sooner or later.
>>>>
>>>>Or I may just leave. Because this has become a very unpleasant place to
>>>>be.
>>>
>>>
>>> Julie, for heavens sake, EVERYBODY knew what post it was, it was the
>>> only post that appeared on ASD with the word "GASTROPARESIS" in the
>>> heading. You keep railing on about wanting to know what post was
>>> being pointed out to you. How did you miss it? Go look for it
>>> yourself, nobody is going to repost it for you! I am not, and I
>>> doubt others will either. You need to be proactive about these
>>> things.
>>
>>I saw a post by Wendy that was about gastroparesis. I read it. It said
>>that there are fewer people who have it than once thought. So again, I
>>state... How could that be helpful to me? I was diagnosed with it via
>>endoscopy. And it was then confirmed. Is Robert saying that perhaps I
>>don't actually have it? That my Dr. was wrong? Or is he somehow laughing
>>at me because I am one of the few who does have it? I don't get it. I
>>really don't. If that was the post that was supposed to be helpful to
>>*me*.
>>It wasn't. Nothing wrong with the post but I just don't get the *helpful
>>to
>>me* factor.
>>
>>And then after I read the post, Tiger Lily said I needed to go back and
>>look
>>again. When I did, I saw the reply from Ozgirl. Again, nothing wrong
>>with
>>that but again, nothing helpful to me. So could you please explain why
>>this
>>would be helpful to me? Because truly I do not get it.
>
>
> I have no idea.
>
> I think they saw the word "gastroparesis" and knowing you had issues
> with it, they mentioned it.
>
> If it is not helpful to you, just ignore it!!!!!!!!

But you see, I couldn't do that because that is how the attacks started!
They said I didn't thank Robert! How could I thank him if I didn't know
what I was thanking him for? I can only assume now that either Robert
didn't read the article or... Robert simply knows nothing about
gastroparesis. Or... I just don't know.