On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 19:16:08 -0800, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>
>"Evelyn" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:57:55 -0800, "Julie Bove"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Evelyn" > wrote in message
...
>>>> On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:42:59 -0800, "Julie Bove"
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Evelyn" > wrote in message
om...
>>>>>> On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 12:01:45 +1000, "Ozgirl"
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>> "Ozgirl" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Cheri" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>> "Evelyn" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>> "All unhappiness is due to the ego; with it comes all your
>>>>>>>>>>> trouble.
>>>>>>>>>>> What does it avail you to attribute to the happenings in life the
>>>>>>>>>>> cause of misery which is really within you? What happiness can
>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>> from things extraneous to yourself ? When you get it, how long
>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>> last ?" -- Ramana Maharshi
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Self-pity is our worst enemy and if we yield to it, we can never
>>>>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>>>>> anything wise in this world.
>>>>>>>>>> ~Helen Keller
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is all getting beyond a joke, you all need to take a good look
>>>>>>>>> at yourselves, this kind of behaviour towards a fellow human being
>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>> shameful. I wouldn't treat a dog in this manner.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No you wouldn't treat a dog that way, but you and Julie treat Susan
>>>>>>>> that way every chance you get, and I never see a word from you about
>>>>>>>> the FOAD that Julie is throwing around all the time. Preacher, take
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>> good look at yourself before taking others to task.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Susan is not a saint and never will be. She makes unprovoked attacks
>>>>>>>at
>>>>>>>every opportunity and she gets back what she gives out. You do know
>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>difference between people tit for tatting with Susan and the behaviour
>>>>>>>of many shown towards Julie.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> NONE of us are saints, neither Susan nor Julie or you or I. There is
>>>>>> no mistaking the term FOAD. It means **** off and die. Not nice by
>>>>>> any means!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I hope this nasty stuff gets settled soon!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peace!
>>>>>
>>>>>And it wasn't meant to be nice. I am not a doormat. And I am not here
>>>>>to
>>>>>be verbally abused over and over again. Seems many people here seem to
>>>>>think it is okay to do it to me. Ah but when I do it to them? Well!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Julie, we cannot possibly control other people, but if you think to
>>>> yourself, "what will be the result of telling someone to **** off and
>>>> die, will it bring peace? Will it escalate the problems? Will it
>>>> help anyone? Will it help me?"...... I think you will discover that
>>>> the answer to all of those questions is "no".
>>>>
>>>Perhaps as a Buddhist you are here to bring peace. I am not.
>>>
>>>Did their attacks help me? No. In fact I *still* don't know which post
>>>was
>>>the post that was supposed to be helpful to me. That is how this all
>>>started. Robert Miles left me a vague message and pinged me about it. He
>>>didn't tell me specifically which one it was. And when I said I couldn't
>>>find a post that was helpful to me, instead of someone pointing out where
>>>or
>>>what this post was, they just started attacking me and telling me I was
>>>ungrateful!
>>>
>>>> We all get on one anothers nerves from time to time. You and I had a
>>>> few words a while back and I was sorry that it happened and we both
>>>> made some effort to smooth it all over.
>>>>
>>>> That needs to happen in this instance too, sooner or later.
>>>
>>>Or I may just leave. Because this has become a very unpleasant place to
>>>be.
>>
>>
>> Julie, for heavens sake, EVERYBODY knew what post it was, it was the
>> only post that appeared on ASD with the word "GASTROPARESIS" in the
>> heading. You keep railing on about wanting to know what post was
>> being pointed out to you. How did you miss it? Go look for it
>> yourself, nobody is going to repost it for you! I am not, and I
>> doubt others will either. You need to be proactive about these
>> things.
>
>I saw a post by Wendy that was about gastroparesis. I read it. It said
>that there are fewer people who have it than once thought. So again, I
>state... How could that be helpful to me? I was diagnosed with it via
>endoscopy. And it was then confirmed. Is Robert saying that perhaps I
>don't actually have it? That my Dr. was wrong? Or is he somehow laughing
>at me because I am one of the few who does have it? I don't get it. I
>really don't. If that was the post that was supposed to be helpful to *me*.
>It wasn't. Nothing wrong with the post but I just don't get the *helpful to
>me* factor.
>
>And then after I read the post, Tiger Lily said I needed to go back and look
>again. When I did, I saw the reply from Ozgirl. Again, nothing wrong with
>that but again, nothing helpful to me. So could you please explain why this
>would be helpful to me? Because truly I do not get it.


I have no idea.

I think they saw the word "gastroparesis" and knowing you had issues
with it, they mentioned it.

If it is not helpful to you, just ignore it!!!!!!!!

Evelyn