"W. Baker" > wrote in message
...
> Ozgirl > wrote:
>
>
> : "W. Baker" > wrote in message
> : ...
> : > Julie Bove > wrote:
> : >
> : > : "Tiger Lily" > wrote in message
> : > : ...
> : > : > On 1/1/2012 4:36 PM, Malcom "Mal" Reynolds wrote:
> : > : >> In >, "Julie
> : > : >> >
> : > : >> wrote:
> : > : >>
> : > : >>> "Robert > wrote in message
> : > : >>> ...
> : > : >>>> There's a post on gastroparesis over in misc.health.diabetes
> : > that I
> : > : >>>> thought you would want to see.
> : > : >>>
> : > : >>> Why? I know I have it. A post telling me that less diabetics
> : > have it
> : > : >>> than
> : > : >>> originally thought just doesn't do me any good.
> : > : >>
> : > : >> once again julie goes to great lengths to demonstrate just how
> : > ungrateful
> : > : >> she is
> : > : >> for any help
> : > : >
> : > : > without even reading the post in question that had nothing to do
> : > with her
> : > : > "i already know it all" approach
> : > : >
> : > : > i give up
> : > : >
> : > : > i've tried
> : > : >
> : > : > and i'm probably be STUPID enough to reply to her again (i know i
> : > have
> : > : > already today)
> : > : >
> : > : > but the animosity that her every post exhibits..................
> : > Julie,
> : > : > send me a FOAD e-mail, you have my info
> : >
> : > : I guess I don't even know what you are talking about.
> : >
> : > : I saw a post by Wendy. She failed to put the link on ASD but she
> : > put a link
> : > : up on MHD. The link said that fewer people have gastroparesis than
> : > : originally thought. I know I have it. It has been confirmed twice
> : > by a
> : > : gastroenterologist.
> : >
> : > : I also saw Ozgirl reply about a person she knew that not only had
> : > that but
> : > : bowel cancer. And that woman was on a liquid diet.
> : >
> : > : What does this have to do with me? I just don't get it.
> : >
> : > : Apparently I am missing something.
> : >
> : > : You are clearly angry with me but I don't know why.
> : >
> : > I had sent the post about the article to BOTH MHD AND ASD, BUT FOR
> : > SOME
> : > REASON, NOT MY FAULT it never arrived on asd. It was not my
> : > failure!!!!
> : >
> : > The implication that somehow iwas wrong or not good enough to not have
> : > put
> : > it on asd is not vice. Why say I dfailed, rather than something like
> : > it
> : > was just on mhd or no evaluation comment at all?
> : >
> : > Wendy
>
> : Wendy, the word *failed* doesn't have to have negative connotations. If
> : I send an email and get a message back that the message has failed that
> : doesn't mean I wasn't good enough or wrong etc, just that the sending
> : didn't succeed in its purpose. In this instance I don't think Julie
> : meant you any ill will by using the (correct) word.
>
> It seemed quite judgemental to me. I sent the article to a group I didn't
> even think julie read because I didn't tink she woudl find anyting from
> it, then later thried to get it to ASD, but it idn't work.
>
> I think julie shuld watch her words, as they can send the wrong meaning if
> she did not man to criticise. She is often very free with her disgust at
> things other people enjoy, usually foods, but is quick to take offense if
> she thinks someone is somehow criticising or being at all "judgemental"
> about her. I usually remain silent, but this one just pushed the wrong
> button.

I have always read both groups. But if it was your post that Robert was
referring to, then I don't know why he would have thought that would be of
interest to me. Or maybe he didn't read it? I still don't know. Robert
hasn't said anything since.