"W. Baker" > wrote in message
...
> Julie Bove > wrote:
>
> : "Tiger Lily" > wrote in message
> : ...
> : > On 1/1/2012 4:36 PM, Malcom "Mal" Reynolds wrote:
> : >> In >, "Julie
> : >> >
> : >> wrote:
> : >>
> : >>> "Robert > wrote in message
> : >>> ...
> : >>>> There's a post on gastroparesis over in misc.health.diabetes
> that I
> : >>>> thought you would want to see.
> : >>>
> : >>> Why? I know I have it. A post telling me that less diabetics
> have it
> : >>> than
> : >>> originally thought just doesn't do me any good.
> : >>
> : >> once again julie goes to great lengths to demonstrate just how
> ungrateful
> : >> she is
> : >> for any help
> : >
> : > without even reading the post in question that had nothing to do
> with her
> : > "i already know it all" approach
> : >
> : > i give up
> : >
> : > i've tried
> : >
> : > and i'm probably be STUPID enough to reply to her again (i know i
> have
> : > already today)
> : >
> : > but the animosity that her every post exhibits..................
> Julie,
> : > send me a FOAD e-mail, you have my info
>
> : I guess I don't even know what you are talking about.
>
> : I saw a post by Wendy. She failed to put the link on ASD but she
> put a link
> : up on MHD. The link said that fewer people have gastroparesis than
> : originally thought. I know I have it. It has been confirmed twice
> by a
> : gastroenterologist.
>
> : I also saw Ozgirl reply about a person she knew that not only had
> that but
> : bowel cancer. And that woman was on a liquid diet.
>
> : What does this have to do with me? I just don't get it.
>
> : Apparently I am missing something.
>
> : You are clearly angry with me but I don't know why.
>
> I had sent the post about the article to BOTH MHD AND ASD, BUT FOR
> SOME
> REASON, NOT MY FAULT it never arrived on asd. It was not my
> failure!!!!
>
> The implication that somehow iwas wrong or not good enough to not have
> put
> it on asd is not vice. Why say I dfailed, rather than something like
> it
> was just on mhd or no evaluation comment at all?
>
> Wendy

Wendy, the word *failed* doesn't have to have negative connotations. If
I send an email and get a message back that the message has failed that
doesn't mean I wasn't good enough or wrong etc, just that the sending
didn't succeed in its purpose. In this instance I don't think Julie
meant you any ill will by using the (correct) word.