On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:51:29 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:

>
>
><dh@.> wrote in message ...
>> On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 11:28:31 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 11:00:15 -0800, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 8 Dec 2011 16:36:47 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>><dh@.> wrote in message
om...
>>>>>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 13:57:58 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 11:56:36 -0800, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 18:23:23 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>><dh@.> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>news:bvagd7drjll6ds6nvounhd5a31ltl21mua@4 ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:33:17 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:27:28 -0800, dh@. pointed out:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> All I did was to point out a fact. Apparently it's another
>>>>>>>>>>>> one of
>>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>facts that you people hate. So it's not me that disgusts you, but
>>>>>>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>>>>>fact is
>>>>>>>>>>>>what disgusts you. Why does it "disgust" you that what I've been
>>>>>>>>>>>>pointing
>>>>>>>>>>>>out
>>>>>>>>>>>>for ten years, has been true for ten thousand years?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>A meaningless one.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> For one thing it's not meaningless and for another even if it
>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>> be no reason for you to hate it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Vegans don't promote life for livestock animals, you
>>>>>>>>>>>don't promote life for porcupines, who cares?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> People who want to promote decent AW over elimination.
>>>>>>>>>> Doiiieee.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>That is an invalid dichotomy. Doiiieee.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"Decent AW" <retch> is promoted over "poor AW"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's also promoted over eliminations.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>By you
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL!!! By anyone who favors decent AW over elimination.
>>>>. . .
>>>>>invalid dichotomy
>>>>
>>>> Explain how you want people to try to pretend it is. Go:
>>>
>>>Non-parallel
>>>
>>>"Decent AW"...relates a scenario where
>>>livestock animals are...bred
>> . . .
>>>"elimination" ... relates to a scenario where no animals are bred
>>
>> Then the choice between the two lifestyles isn't a dichotomy at all,
>> not a
>> false one
>
>You offer it as a dichotomy ("A over B"), it's false for the reasons I
>stated.

What a blatant lie that is. It's a true choice and not false for any
reasons, much less any reasons you can come up with.

>The whole premise is fake, a very sloppy attempt at sleight of
>hand..

Why do you contemptibly want people to falsley believe they can't
deliberately contribute to decent AW situations with their lifestlye, instead of
deliberately trying not to?