WHY VEGANISM?
<dh@.> wrote in message ...
> On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 18:23:23 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:
>
>><dh@.> wrote in message ...
>>> On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:33:17 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:27:28 -0800, dh@. pointed out:
>>>>
>>>>> All I did was to point out a fact. Apparently it's another one of
>>>>> those
>>>>>facts that you people hate. So it's not me that disgusts you, but the
>>>>>fact is
>>>>>what disgusts you. Why does it "disgust" you that what I've been
>>>>>pointing
>>>>>out
>>>>>for ten years, has been true for ten thousand years?
>>>>
>>>>A meaningless one.
>>>
>>> For one thing it's not meaningless and for another even if it was
>>> that
>>> would
>>> be no reason for you to hate it.
>>>
>>>>Vegans don't promote life for livestock animals, you
>>>>don't promote life for porcupines, who cares?
>>>
>>> People who want to promote decent AW over elimination. Doiiieee.
>>
>>That is an invalid dichotomy. Doiiieee.
>>
>>"Decent AW" <retch> is promoted over "poor AW"
>
> It's also promoted over eliminations.
By you, an established idiot.
>>"Elimination" is promoted over "continuation" (of livestock farming).
>>
>>Continuation is necessary before AW of any kind can be a consideration.
>
> That's one of the reasons why people who are truly in favor of decent
> AW
> over elimination
False dichotomy
|