On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:30:28 -0500, Pete C. wrote:

> blake murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 20:48:17 -0500, Pete C. wrote:
>>
>>> sf wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 17:25:00 -0500, "Pete C." >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ask the folks in CA, IL, NY, CT, NJ and a few other states where peoples
>>>>> constitutional rights are indeed being trampled. Ask folks who's rights
>>>>> were trampled by the now expired ugly gun ban. When the second amendment
>>>>> was written it wasn't about "sporting" guns, or antique guns, it was
>>>>> about guns that were the then state of the art and defensive use was
>>>>> very much what was being considered.
>>>>
>>>> The gun laws in California are the way voters want them, and we're
>>>> working on making them even more restrictive.
>>>
>>> The courts may have something to say about your attempts to infringe on
>>> peoples constitutional rights. Indeed, I recently read that there have
>>> been significant increases in issuing CHLs in parts of CA this year.
>>
>> ooh, sounds like their rights are being trampled, all right. or would you
>> prefer 'must carry' laws?
>
> "Must issue" (with clean background check) is just fine thank you.

sissy.

blake