On May 28, 9:39*am, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
> On Sat, 28 May 2011 15:37:54 +0100, "john ryan"
>
> > wrote:
> >In the recent U.K. television series Jamie Oliver attempts to gain access to
> >LA's schools kitchens, to help them rustle up some cost effective yet
> >nutritious food for the children, as he did with the schools in the U.K.
>
> >LA's school board seemed dead set against him making any headway with this
> >project, and barred his participation.
>
> >I can't understand the board's motivation. Why would take this line? Since
> >you would think they would have the interests of the kids at heart, helping
> >them with their diet.
>
> >What could be their motivation in stopping this nutrition project, I wonder?
>
> Most cooks know next to nothing about nutrition... Jamie Oliver can
> hardly be called a cook, he's a TV personality, and quite boring. *And
> since when did the UK produce any cooks, they don't even have a
> cuisine... fried fish w/potatoes and cucumber sammys ain't cuisine. Do
> you really think the kids in LA are going to fress spotted dick? *
> Kids don't get fat on school lunches anyway, in fact the best way to
> lose weight is on a diet solely of school lunches, most keds would
> rather fast. *Kids get fat from eating at home and at fast food
> joints. *Yoose want healthy kids, feed them two hours of forced
> gymnasium every day. *Yoose won't see any fatties hangin' at the
> basketball courts.... the fatties are all indoors at their PC, ten
> feet from the fridge, while watching Jamie Oliver trash.

==
Not to mention that James Oliver is a furriner who has no freakin
business in the kitchens of any school other than the ones in his own
freakin country. He's just after headlines...tell him to **** off.
==