View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.food.wine
lleichtman lleichtman is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 408
Default Dunn disappointment

On May 27, 11:31*am, "Bi!!" > wrote:
> On May 27, 10:05*am, Mark Lipton > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > lleichtman wrote:
> > > Have been holding onto a bottle of Dunn Howell Mountain 1998 as drank
> > > the other two tannic monsters. Well the tannins resolved but the fruit
> > > had disappeared. What a bummer. Not sure when you are really supposed
> > > to drink these as the other two bottles were so huge and waited two
> > > more years for this one. Still have two 1999 Dunn HM and wondering
> > > when to drink them. Probably will go ahead.

>
> > Larry,
> > * * For the record, '98 was a vintage that was never overly fruity (in
> > comparison to '97 and '99) and I admit that that was much of its
> > attraction for me, as the Cabs from '98 had a much more savory quality
> > to them. *That being said, I'm still holding off on my '94, '95 and '99
> > HM. *A few years ago, I did open a '90 Napa that was just wonderful, so
> > I still have some hope.

>
> > Mark Lipton

>
> Mark-Dunn's Napa Cabs are remarkable I think he makes the HM a bit too
> rustic and I would like to taste one where the fruit outlasted the
> tannins.


Good to know I'm not alone here. I had other 1998 wines that were
better. This one just never did it.