> wrote:
>Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 18:27:07 -0700, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote:
>>
>>>> If wine needs decanting and filtering to make it drinkable then it wasn't
>>>> worth more than $2/liter to begin with...
>>>
>>>Never even heard of vintage port, have you?
>>
>> Actually there is vintage port and it can be quite pricy,
>
>Um, duh. That was his point. That pricy vintage port often requires
>decanting due to sediment, which rather argues against the claim that
>wines worth more than $2/liter don't need decanting.

There is never a reason to decant any wine, if there is sediment just
don't shake it up... oh, I see now... yoose decant into a fancy
schmancy bottle so your guests won't know you're serving
Boone's Farm. Maybe I'll buy some $50 bottle of vodka so I can decant
too! LOL-LOL

What a buncha phony baloney pretentious schmucks!

Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. . . .